<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Evidence on Signal Through Static</title><link>https://signalthroughstatic.cc/casefiles/evidence/</link><description>Recent content in Evidence on Signal Through Static</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><copyright>© 2026 S. Caronia / J. Miller · &lt;a href="https://github.com/josephusm/blog/blob/main/LICENSE" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CC BY-NC-SA 4.0&lt;/a> · &lt;a href="https://github.com/josephusm/blog/blob/main/COPYRIGHT" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Copyright&lt;/a></copyright><lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://signalthroughstatic.cc/casefiles/evidence/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Half-Life of Evidence</title><link>https://signalthroughstatic.cc/signals/the-half-life-of-evidence/</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://signalthroughstatic.cc/signals/the-half-life-of-evidence/</guid><description>&lt;p>Imagine this: a worker reports a threat. The complaint is received, assigned a number and closed because there is not enough evidence.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Four months later another worker reports the same conduct. New number, new reviewer, same conclusion.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>A third report arrives after the first file has expired. The institution can now say that its available records show no pattern.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Nobody prohibited a sentence. The system only prevented three true sentences from meeting.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>