<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacking on Signal Through Static</title><link>https://signalthroughstatic.cc/casefiles/hacking/</link><description>Recent content in Hacking on Signal Through Static</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><copyright>© 2026 S. Caronia / J. Miller · &lt;a href="https://github.com/josephusm/blog/blob/main/LICENSE" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CC BY-NC-SA 4.0&lt;/a> · &lt;a href="https://github.com/josephusm/blog/blob/main/COPYRIGHT" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Copyright&lt;/a></copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://signalthroughstatic.cc/casefiles/hacking/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Finding the Cracks in the Wall: On Abstract Hacktivism</title><link>https://signalthroughstatic.cc/signals/finding-the-cracks-in-the-wall/</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://signalthroughstatic.cc/signals/finding-the-cracks-in-the-wall/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;em>Abstract Hacktivism: The Making of a Hacker Culture&lt;/em>, by Otto von Busch and Karl Palmås, is a 2006 publication from the University of Gothenburg that pairs two extended essays into a single argument. The argument is this: the computer is not just a tool. It is the dominant conceptual model of our time — the way we think about organisations, economies, politics, resistance. And the process by which this model became dominant was not a matter of technological inevitability. It was, in large part, paid for by the dot-com bubble.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>