Casefiles for: #Power

The Half-Life of Evidence

Imagine this: a worker reports a threat. The complaint is received, assigned a number and closed because there is not enough evidence.

Four months later another worker reports the same conduct. New number, new reviewer, same conclusion.

A third report arrives after the first file has expired. The institution can now say that its available records show no pattern.

Nobody prohibited a sentence. The system only prevented three true sentences from meeting.

[Open case]

The Index Is Not the Myth

Angela Cerinotti’s Miti greci e di Roma antica ends with an index that accidentally delivers the book’s sharpest argument. Zeus receives 496 references. Near the end come the Vineyard Women with seven, Zagreus with eight, and Tithonus with eight. The numbers map the gravitational field of the pantheon, but they do not measure what remains in the reader. I remember the three Vineyard Women, indexed seven times, more clearly than the 496 appearances of Zeus.

[Open case]

Delegated Blindness

Every system of power needs a blind spot. Not a flaw — a feature.

A government builds a surveillance infrastructure. It needs to see everything — communications metadata, network traffic, financial flows. But if it could see what it collects, it would be politically accountable for what it knows. So it delegates the seeing to someone else.

The UK awards Palantir £330 million to build the NHS Federated Data Platform. The government “owns” the data. The contractor owns the analytical capability — cross-departmental “drag and drop” data analysis, the same architecture that powers ICE operations in the United States. Palantir says it has “no intention” of enabling cross-departmental surveillance in the UK. But the capability is structural, and the law can change — Reform UK has already pledged to “automatically share data between the Home Office, NHS, HMRC, DVLA, banks and the police.” The blind spot is load-bearing: if the government could see what the contractor’s architecture makes possible, the arrangement would be politically untenable.

[Open case]

Phantom Targets, Phantom Guardians

Every system that acts on the world needs a legible object. An intelligence apparatus needs a target it can name, locate, and strike. A regulatory framework needs a threat it can define, measure, and legislate against. A search index needs documents it can rank and cite with confidence.

When the real object does not fit the system’s grammar, the system does not stop. It fabricates an object from its own categories and operates on that with full confidence.

[Open case]